Thom v. McAdam
626 So. 2d 184, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1993 WL 380217
Opinion
We have for review McAdam v. Thom, 610 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite. The nonconflict issues will not be addressed at this time.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thom v. McAdam, 626 So. 2d 184, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1993 WL 380217 (Fla. 1993).
626 So. 2d 184 (Thom v. McAdam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waite v. Waite
618 So. 2d 1360 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
McAdam v. Thom
610 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)