Thom v. McAdam

626 So. 2d 184, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1993 WL 380217
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 1993
DocketNo. 81378
StatusPublished

This text of 626 So. 2d 184 (Thom v. McAdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thom v. McAdam, 626 So. 2d 184, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1993 WL 380217 (Fla. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review McAdam v. Thom, 610 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on express and direct conflict with Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The opinion below is quashed, and this cause is remanded for reconsideration in light of Waite. The nonconflict issues will not be addressed at this time.

It is so ordered.

[185]*185BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waite v. Waite
618 So. 2d 1360 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
McAdam v. Thom
610 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 So. 2d 184, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 517, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1553, 1993 WL 380217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thom-v-mcadam-fla-1993.