Thoele v. Mazel
131 N.E.2d 133, 8 Ill. App. 2d 237
Opinion
Maurice E. Thoele, Appellant,
v.
S.H. Mazel and Helen Mazel, d/b/a Mazel and Company; Superior Paint Stores, Inc., William Thoele, d/b/a Atomic Venetian Blind Service, Defendants, Phillip G. Burgiegi, d/b/a Elm Die Cutting, Appellee.
Illinois Appellate Court First District, Third Division.
*238 Casimir W. Wachowski, and M.C. Zacharias, for appellant.
Casimir R. Wachowski, M.C. Zacharias, and William M. Daemicke, of counsel.
McNamara, Voigt, Green & Nordstrand, for appellee.
Charles D. Snewind, of counsel.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by JUDGE FEINBERG.
Affirmed.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thoele v. Mazel, 131 N.E.2d 133, 8 Ill. App. 2d 237 (Ill. Ct. App. 1956).
131 N.E.2d 133 (Thoele v. Mazel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Quincy Housing Authority
229 N.E.2d 780 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1967)
Stewart v. Gannaway
195 N.E.2d 255 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1964)