Thistle v. Thistle

New York Supreme Court

Thistle v. Thistle

66 How. Pr. 472

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 How. Pr. 472 (Thistle v. Thistle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thistle v. Thistle, 66 How. Pr. 472 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Donohue, J

The sole object of service is to procure the the appearance of the party. Where, as in this case, the infant has, on the application of its own voluntary representation appeared, that is sufficient; the intent of the case being that the infant should have its day in court, and the infant has had it here. How the service was made is of no importance, as the appearance is not dependent on that.

Objections overruled and motion to be discharged denied,, with ten dollar's costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donohue, J

The sole object of service is to procure the the appearance of the party. Where, as in this case, the infant has, on the application of its own voluntary representation appeared, that is sufficient; the intent of the case being that the infant should have its day in court, and the infant has had it here. How the service was made is of no importance, as the appearance is not dependent on that.

Objections overruled and motion to be discharged denied,, with ten dollar's costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 How. Pr. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thistle-v-thistle-nysupct-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack