Thirtle v. Hastings

Florida Circuit Courts

Thirtle v. Hastings

7 Fla. Supp. 2d 89

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedJuly 16, 1984

DocketCase No. 83-283 AP

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Fla. Supp. 2d 89 (Thirtle v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thirtle v. Hastings, 7 Fla. Supp. 2d 89 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a Summary Judgment granted in an action brought by a dentist for dental services and other professional services. We reverse. We find that the Summary Final Judgment should not have been entered; and that the Motion of Leave to file Counterclaim and the Motion to Set Aside Admissions should have been granted. Setting aside the admissions would clearly create issues of fact precluding Summary Judgment. More important, however, is the denial of the Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim. Justice requires an opportunity to fully litigate a matter.

[90]*90The court gave no reasons in denying the Motion to Set Aside Admissions and in its Order denying the Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim. We find this to be error.

Accordingly, the Judgment is reversed and remanded with directions to permit the filing of the Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a Summary Judgment granted in an action brought by a dentist for dental services and other professional services. We reverse. We find that the Summary Final Judgment should not have been entered; and that the Motion of Leave to file Counterclaim and the Motion to Set Aside Admissions should have been granted. Setting aside the admissions would clearly create issues of fact precluding Summary Judgment. More important, however, is the denial of the Motion for Leave to File a Counterclaim. Justice requires an opportunity to fully litigate a matter.

[90]*90The court gave no reasons in denying the Motion to Set Aside Admissions and in its Order denying the Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim. We find this to be error.

Accordingly, the Judgment is reversed and remanded with directions to permit the filing of the Counterclaim and Third Party Complaint.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Fla. Supp. 2d 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thirtle-v-hastings-flacirct-1984.