Third National Bank of Syracuse v. . Keeffe

63 N.E. 1122, 171 N.Y. 647, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 922
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 1902·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.; Gray, J., dissenting upon the ground that error was committed in receiving Elizabeth Keeffe’s evidence ; O’Brien, J., dissenting generally ; Vann, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Third National Bank of Syracuse v. . Keeffe, 63 N.E. 1122, 171 N.Y. 647, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 922 (N.Y. 1902).

63 N.E. 1122 (Third National Bank of Syracuse v. . Keeffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.