Third Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. Reeves Grocery Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Third Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. Reeves Grocery Co.

73 So. 866, 113 Miss. 35

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 So. 866 (Third Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. Reeves Grocery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Third Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. Reeves Grocery Co., 73 So. 866, 113 Miss. 35 (Mich. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Ethbidge, J.,

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

There are no errors in the record sufficient to reverse the cause. The court had the discretion to require security for cost incurred by reason of its claim. The burden was on plaintiff in attachment on the trial of the claimant’s issue (sections 163, 2352, and 4994', Code of 1906), but the issue was tried before the judge, and the record does not show any injury by appellant presenting its proof first.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ethbidge, J.,

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

There are no errors in the record sufficient to reverse the cause. The court had the discretion to require security for cost incurred by reason of its claim. The burden was on plaintiff in attachment on the trial of the claimant’s issue (sections 163, 2352, and 4994', Code of 1906), but the issue was tried before the judge, and the record does not show any injury by appellant presenting its proof first.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 So. 866, 113 Miss. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/third-nat-bank-of-st-louis-v-reeves-grocery-co-miss-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack