Thimiogianis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thimiogianis v. State

280 S.W.3d 110, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 69, 2009 WL 242292

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2009·No. No. ED 91251·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, William Thimiogianis, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, William Thimiogianis, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Thimiogianis v. State, 280 S.W.3d 110, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 69, 2009 WL 242292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

280 S.W.3d 110 (Thimiogianis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.