Thigpen v. Thigpen
71 S.E. 790, 136 Ga. 541, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 131
Opinion
The plaintiff brought suit to recover a distributive share in the estate of his maternal grandfather, who died subsequently to the date of the death of plaintiff’s mother. It appeared from the evidence that the plaintiff was a bastard. Being such, he was not capable of inheriting from the grandfather; and consequently the court did not err in holding that he could riot reeoyer, and in directing a verdict accordingly. Civil Code (1910), § 3029.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thigpen v. Thigpen, 71 S.E. 790, 136 Ga. 541, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 131 (Ga. 1911).
71 S.E. 790 (Thigpen v. Thigpen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mincey v. Mincey
212 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)