Thigpen v. State

125 S.E. 607, 33 Ga. App. 174, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 805
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket15972
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 607 (Thigpen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thigpen v. State, 125 S.E. 607, 33 Ga. App. 174, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 805 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction and the charge of the court was full, fair, and not subject to the criticism urged in the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 607, 33 Ga. App. 174, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thigpen-v-state-gactapp-1924.