Thigpen v. State

76 S.E. 596, 11 Ga. App. 846, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 220
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 10, 1912·No. 4494·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Pottle, J.

1. It is not reversible error to fail to charge the jury upon a theory of defense arising solely under the prisoner’s statement, in the absence of a timely written request for such instructions. Cobb v. State, 11 Ga. App. 52 (74 S. E. 702).

2. Failure of the trial judge to attempt to elucidate the words “reasonable doubt” is not reversible error. Barker v. State, 1 Ga. App. 288 (57 S. E. 989).

3. The following instruction was not erroneous: “Every person chai-ged with crime is by law presumed to be innocent until proven [guilty] by competent evidence. Moral and reasonable certainty is all that can be obtained in legal investigation.” Austin v. State, 6 Ga. App. 211 (64 S. E. 670).

4. The evidence authorized the verdict. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thigpen v. State, 76 S.E. 596, 11 Ga. App. 846, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

76 S.E. 596 (Thigpen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
149 S.E.2d 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
McDowell v. State
50 S.E.2d 633 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Fitzgerald v. State
190 S.E. 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Sheffield v. State
83 S.E. 871 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Carter v. State
83 S.E. 153 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Hall v. State
77 S.E. 893 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)