Thigpen v. Riner Mercantile Co.
This text of 93 S.E. 175 (Thigpen v. Riner Mercantile Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence authorized the verdict, and the refusal of the trial judge to grant a new trial 'was not erroneous. It is argued in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error that the evidence for the plaintiff showed that the defendant was indebted to the-plaintiff as follows: $238.24 on open account, $25 on note, $40 on another, and $60 on another; but the evidence for the plaintiff really showed that the defendant was indebted to it on still another and additional note of $60; ■ which reconciles the verdict to the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 175, 20 Ga. App. 576, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thigpen-v-riner-mercantile-co-gactapp-1917.