Thigpen, Ex Parte Henry Wilson

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 4, 2009
DocketAP-76,252
StatusPublished

This text of Thigpen, Ex Parte Henry Wilson (Thigpen, Ex Parte Henry Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thigpen, Ex Parte Henry Wilson, (Tex. 2009).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. AP-76,250, AP-76,251, AP-76,252 & AP-76,253

EX PARTE HENRY WILSON THIGPEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 43893A; 43894A; 43895A; 43976A IN THE 400 TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FORT BEND COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault of

a public servant and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment; evading arrest and sentenced to

five years’ imprisonment; assault domestic violence and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment; and

violation of a protective order and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of

Appeals affirmed his convictions. Thigpen v. State, Nos. 14-07-10; 14-07-11; 14-07-12; and 14-07-

13 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th], delivered September 27, 2007). 2

Applicant contends that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to timely notify Applicant that his convictions had been affirmed. We remanded this

application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify

Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionary review of the judgments of

the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause Nos. 14-07-00010-CR; 14-07-00011-CR; 14-07-00012-

CR; and 14-07-00013-CR that affirmed convictions in Case Nos. 43893A; 43894A; 43895A; and

43976A from the 400th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County. Applicant shall file petition for

discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this

Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: November 4, 2009 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thigpen, Ex Parte Henry Wilson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thigpen-ex-parte-henry-wilson-texcrimapp-2009.