Thiessen v. General Electric
This text of 255 F.3d 1221 (Thiessen v. General Electric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
255 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2001)
GARY A. THIESSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, doing business as GE Capital, and its representatives; MONTGOMERY WARD CREDIT SERVICES, INC., formerly known as Monogram Retailer Credit Services, Inc., a subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation, and its representatives, Defendants-Appellees,
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS; NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL, Amici Curiae.
No. 98-3208
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
TENTH CIRCUIT
July 3, 2001
NOTE: OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. SEE OPINION AT 267 F.3d 1095.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 F.3d 1221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thiessen-v-general-electric-ca10-2001.