Thiessen v. General Electric

Tenth Circuit

Thiessen v. General Electric

255 F.3d 1221

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2001·No. 98-3208·Published

Opinion

255 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2001)

GARY A. THIESSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, doing business as GE Capital, and its representatives; MONTGOMERY WARD CREDIT SERVICES, INC., formerly known as Monogram Retailer Credit Services, Inc., a subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation, and its representatives, Defendants-Appellees,
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS; NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL, Amici Curiae.

No. 98-3208

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
TENTH CIRCUIT

July 3, 2001

NOTE: OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. SEE OPINION AT 267 F.3d 1095.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

255 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2001)

GARY A. THIESSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, doing business as GE Capital, and its representatives; MONTGOMERY WARD CREDIT SERVICES, INC., formerly known as Monogram Retailer Credit Services, Inc., a subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation, and its representatives, Defendants-Appellees,
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF RETIRED PERSONS; NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL, Amici Curiae.

No. 98-3208

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
TENTH CIRCUIT

July 3, 2001

NOTE: OPINION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. SEE OPINION AT 267 F.3d 1095.

Thiessen v. General Electric, 255 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

255 F.3d 1221 (Thiessen v. General Electric) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related