Thieler v. Coates
This text of 241 A.D. 629 (Thieler v. Coates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting motion for a peremptory mandamus order reversed on the law, and the motion denied, without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion, on the ground that the respondent has failed to show any legal right to a pro rata share of the funds received by the appellants pursuant to chapter 594 of the Laws of 1915. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs on the ground that the application presented no new facts and the petitioner was already receiving all the relief he had claimed in his first application; and there was nothing upon which the board of trustees was required to act. The petition sets up facts not presented to the board.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thieler-v-coates-nyappdiv-1934.