Thielecke v. Munday

555 S.W.2d 376, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2243
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 17, 1977
DocketNo. 10169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 555 S.W.2d 376 (Thielecke v. Munday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thielecke v. Munday, 555 S.W.2d 376, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2243 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s action in sustaining the motions to dismiss of defendants Brawley and Tarvid.

Plaintiff filed a two-count petition in the Circuit Court of Reynolds County. Count one sought damages from defendants Mun-day, Brawley and Tarvid for alleged fraud. Count two was against defendant Munday for alleged negligence.

Defendant Munday filed a motion attacking the venue. Defendants Brawley and Tarvid filed a joint motion to dismiss which the trial court sustained. Plaintiff appealed.

The order appealed from does not dispose of all the parties and all the issues and is not a final judgment for purposes of appeal within the meaning of Rule 74.01, V.A. M.R.; Lewis v. Esselman, 512 S.W.2d 423 (Mo.App.1974).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
575 S.W.2d 865 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 S.W.2d 376, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thielecke-v-munday-moctapp-1977.