Thibodeau v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thibodeau v. New York City Housing Authority

290 A.D.2d 390, 737 N.Y.S.2d 276, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 901

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 290 A.D.2d 390 (Thibodeau v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thibodeau v. New York City Housing Authority, 290 A.D.2d 390, 737 N.Y.S.2d 276, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 30, 2001, which denied petitioner’s application to annul the determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights of no probable cause to petitioner’s claim of disability discrimination against the New York City Housing Authority based on its failure to provide adequate elevator service in petitioner’s building, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding was properly dismissed upon a record showing that the building’s elevators received regular routine maintenance, with any problems being promptly addressed, and [391]*391that petitioner had ample opportunity to submit evidence to show otherwise. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered January 30, 2001, which denied petitioner’s application to annul the determination of respondent State Division of Human Rights of no probable cause to petitioner’s claim of disability discrimination against the New York City Housing Authority based on its failure to provide adequate elevator service in petitioner’s building, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding was properly dismissed upon a record showing that the building’s elevators received regular routine maintenance, with any problems being promptly addressed, and [391]*391that petitioner had ample opportunity to submit evidence to show otherwise. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 390, 737 N.Y.S.2d 276, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thibodeau-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2002.