Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thibert v. Thibert

Thibert v. Thibert

106 So. 2d 918
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1958·No. No. 58-334·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final decree appealed from in this cause, being a summary final decree cancel-ling certain instruments, is affirmed, except as to the provision therein for attorneys’' fees for plaintiff’s attorneys; and the order for attorneys’ fees, having been entered in the absence of any provision for such fees, by statute or by contract, must be and hereby is reversed, on authority of Brite v. Orange Belt Securities Co., 133 Fla. 266, 182 So. 892. See also Hoffman v. Barlly, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 355, and cases cited therein.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thibert v. Thibert, 106 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

106 So. 2d 918 (Thibert v. Thibert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carbrell Corp. v. Phil C. Gallagher Associates, Inc.
362 So. 2d 469 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Campbell v. Maze
339 So. 2d 202 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Royal-Globe Insurance Cos. v. Indian River Gas Co.
281 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
State v. Hobbs
161 So. 2d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Shelmark Land Corp. v. Zayas
158 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Fontainebleau Hotel Corporation v. Postol
142 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Ginsberg v. Ginsberg
128 So. 2d 435 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)