Thibert v. Patterson

907 P.2d 1139, 138 Or. App. 294, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 13, 1995
Docket94-3174; CA A86860
StatusPublished

This text of 907 P.2d 1139 (Thibert v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thibert v. Patterson, 907 P.2d 1139, 138 Or. App. 294, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not granting her a postponement of a show cause hearing and requiring her to proceed with the hearing without an attorney. Appellant also asserts that the show cause orders were improperly presented ex parte to the trial judge. Appellant’s designation of the record includes the trial court file and a one-page excerpt of the transcript from the show cause hearing. Based on the record before us, we are unable to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent, not including attorney fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
907 P.2d 1139, 138 Or. App. 294, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thibert-v-patterson-orctapp-1995.