Thibert v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Thibert v. Patterson

907 P.2d 1139, 138 Or. App. 294, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 13, 1995·No. 94-3174; CA A86860·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not granting her a postponement of a show cause hearing and requiring her to proceed with the hearing without an attorney. Appellant also asserts that the show cause orders were improperly presented ex parte to the trial judge. Appellant’s designation of the record includes the trial court file and a one-page excerpt of the transcript from the show cause hearing. Based on the record before us, we are unable to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent, not including attorney fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not granting her a postponement of a show cause hearing and requiring her to proceed with the hearing without an attorney. Appellant also asserts that the show cause orders were improperly presented ex parte to the trial judge. Appellant’s designation of the record includes the trial court file and a one-page excerpt of the transcript from the show cause hearing. Based on the record before us, we are unable to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion.

Affirmed. Costs to respondent, not including attorney fees.

Thibert v. Patterson, 907 P.2d 1139, 138 Or. App. 294, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

907 P.2d 1139 (Thibert v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.