Thibert v. Patterson
This text of 907 P.2d 1139 (Thibert v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by not granting her a postponement of a show cause hearing and requiring her to proceed with the hearing without an attorney. Appellant also asserts that the show cause orders were improperly presented ex parte to the trial judge. Appellant’s designation of the record includes the trial court file and a one-page excerpt of the transcript from the show cause hearing. Based on the record before us, we are unable to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion.
Affirmed. Costs to respondent, not including attorney fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
907 P.2d 1139, 138 Or. App. 294, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thibert-v-patterson-orctapp-1995.