Thibault v. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co.
67 A. 819, 80 Vt. 333, 1907 Vt. LEXIS 107
Opinion
It is sufficient for the disposition of the case that the motion to dismiss does not point out in what respect the service of the writ was defective. Nye v. Burlington & Lamoille R. R. Co., 60 Vt. 585.
Judgment affirmed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thibault v. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co., 67 A. 819, 80 Vt. 333, 1907 Vt. LEXIS 107 (Vt. 1907).
67 A. 819 (Thibault v. Connecticut Valley Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. Cargo
1932 OK 790 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
Bankers' Surety Co. v. Town of Holly
219 F. 96 (Eighth Circuit, 1915)
In re Byron
74 A. 488 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1909)