Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Thevening v. Jian Young Ye

Thevening v. Jian Young Ye

297 A.D.2d 731, 747 N.Y.2d 793, 747 N.Y.S.2d 793, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8654
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 297 A.D.2d 731 (Thevening v. Jian Young Ye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thevening v. Jian Young Ye, 297 A.D.2d 731, 747 N.Y.2d 793, 747 N.Y.S.2d 793, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The defendants forfeited their right to conduct physical examinations of the injured plaintiff when they failed to arrange and conduct the examinations within the time period required by the Supreme Court’s pretrial conference orders (see Vitello v JAM Installers, 264 AD2d 774; Gill v United Parcel Serv., 249 AD2d 265; Levine v McFarland, 98 AD2d 795). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying their motion to compel such discovery.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Feuerstein, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. McFarland
98 A.D.2d 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Gill v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
249 A.D.2d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Vitello v. JAM Installers, Inc.
264 A.D.2d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 731, 747 N.Y.2d 793, 747 N.Y.S.2d 793, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thevening-v-jian-young-ye-nyappdiv-2002.