Theurer v. Romano

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Theurer v. Romano

204 A.2d 204, 85 N.J. Super. 142, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 281

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedOctober 19, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 A.2d 204 (Theurer v. Romano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Theurer v. Romano, 204 A.2d 204, 85 N.J. Super. 142, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 281 (N.J. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Law Division is af-

firmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Artaserse, Theurer v. Borrone, 81 N. J. Super. 188 (Law Div. 1963).

On the cross-appeal of the intervening taxpayers concerning assessment of costs, the order of the trial judge is affirmed, there being no showing of mistaken exercise of discretion in relation to the determination thereon.

No costs on the cross-appeal. Costs on the main appeal to go as of course.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI