Theurer v. Romano
204 A.2d 204, 85 N.J. Super. 142, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 281
Opinion
The judgment of the Law Division is af-
firmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Artaserse, Theurer v. Borrone, 81 N. J. Super. 188 (Law Div. 1963).
On the cross-appeal of the intervening taxpayers concerning assessment of costs, the order of the trial judge is affirmed, there being no showing of mistaken exercise of discretion in relation to the determination thereon.
No costs on the cross-appeal. Costs on the main appeal to go as of course.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Theurer v. Romano, 204 A.2d 204, 85 N.J. Super. 142, 1964 N.J. Super. LEXIS 281 (N.J. Ct. App. 1964).
204 A.2d 204 (Theurer v. Romano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilbert v. Unsatisfied Claim, Etc., Bd.
204 A.2d 204 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)