Theulen v. Township of Viola
This text of 117 N.W. 26 (Theulen v. Township of Viola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[63]*63Where the one road district plan is adopted, the board of township trustees shall order and direct the expenditure of the road funds and labor belonging or owing to the township; may let, by contract, to the lowest responsible competent bidder, any part or all of the work on the roads for the current year, or may appoint not to exceed four superintendents of roads, to oversee, subject to the direction of the board, all or any part of the work, but it shall not incur an indebtedness for such purposes unless the same has been or shall at the time be provided for by an authorized levy; and shall order the township road tax for the succeeding year paid in money and collected by the county treasurer. It shall cause both the property and poll road tax to be equitably and judiciously expended for road purposes in the entire road district; shall cause at least seventy-five per cent, of the township road tax locally assessed to be thus expended by the fifteenth day of July in each year; shall cause the noxious weeds growing in the roads to be cut twice a year, when necessary, and at such times as to prevent their seeding, and it may allow any landowner a reasonable compensation for the destruction thereof, when growing in the roads abutting upon his land. If a superintendent, or superintendents of roads be employed, it shall fix the term of office, which shall not exceed one year, and compensation, which shall not exceed three dollars a day; and no contract shall be made without reserving the right of the board to dispense with his services at its pleasure.
They are to require the qualification of the clerk, contractor, and superintendent, and are to “ receive the same compensation per day for the time necessarily spent in looking after the roads as they do for other township business.” Section 1538, Code Supp. 1907. It is apparent from mere reading of the several statutes that the duty of actually repairing the highways is not cast on the trustees. Their duty is to exercise general supervision, but the work is to be done and the responsibility assumed by the contractor or superintendent who is subjected to the same accountability as the supervisor under section 1557 of the Code. See section 1536. The duty of the board of trustees is to determine for which of the several purposes enumerated in the section [64]*64with reference to the tax levy and how much for each the money raised shall be expended, how much of that devoted to roads shall be set apart for each, whether the work shall be done by contract or through employment of superintendents, but it does not devolve upon them to perform the duty of keeping the roads in repair. That is the duty of the contractor or superintendent, and he alone is liable under the conditions, defined by statute for damages consequent upon omission of such duty. In short, all the duties of the board of trustees in such matters are quasi-judicial, and no liability attaches because of mere error or .mistakes even negligent alone in their performance. See Nolan v. Reed et al, 139 Iowa, 68; Mechem on Public Officers,' section 700; Throop on Public Officers, section 736. The ruling in sustaining the demurrer was correct.— Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 N.W. 26, 139 Iowa 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theulen-v-township-of-viola-iowa-1908.