Thetford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Thetford v. State

5 S.W.3d 478, 339 Ark. 489, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 641

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 16, 1999

DocketCR 99-1352

StatusPublished

This text of 5 S.W.3d 478 (Thetford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thetford v. State, 5 S.W.3d 478, 339 Ark. 489, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 641 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Curiam.

Appellant Dana Daniel Thetford, by and through John Wesley Hall, Jr., attorney, has filed a motion for belated appeal. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Attorney Hall admits by motion that the record of the postconviction proceedings was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Polletta v. State, 327 Ark. 677, 939 S.W.2d 310 (1997) (per curiam); Guss v. State, 325 Ark. 521, 928 S.W.2d 336 (1996)(per curiam); McCready v. State, 325 Ark. 418, 924 S.W.2d 813 (1996)(per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI