Thermasol, Ltd. v. Sunroc Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thermasol, Ltd. v. Sunroc Corp.

38 A.D.2d 702, 328 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5470

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 31, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 38 A.D.2d 702 (Thermasol, Ltd. v. Sunroc Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thermasol, Ltd. v. Sunroc Corp., 38 A.D.2d 702, 328 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 8, 1971, granting protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the motion denied, and discovery directed to proceed in accord with plaintiff’s notice. Appellant shall recover of respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Defendant on examination before trial obtained some 311 invoices purporting to show plaintiff’s damages. Defendant asserts- to several discrepancies in these invoices which challenge their validity and seeks a discovery of the underlying -books recording these invoices. We believe that sufficient has been [703]*703shown to warrant this investigation. A request for a discovery of plaintiff’s income tax returns has been withdrawn. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 8, 1971, granting protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the motion denied, and discovery directed to proceed in accord with plaintiff’s notice. Appellant shall recover of respondent $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Defendant on examination before trial obtained some 311 invoices purporting to show plaintiff’s damages. Defendant asserts- to several discrepancies in these invoices which challenge their validity and seeks a discovery of the underlying -books recording these invoices. We believe that sufficient has been [703]*703shown to warrant this investigation. A request for a discovery of plaintiff’s income tax returns has been withdrawn. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 A.D.2d 702, 328 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thermasol-ltd-v-sunroc-corp-nyappdiv-1972.