Therkeldsen v. Dorfner

131 N.W. 481, 115 Minn. 528, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1282
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 9, 1911·No. Nos. 17,142—(142)·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The assignments of error, though insufficient, are construed as presenting the sole question whether the evidence supports the findings and decision of the trial •court. We have examined the record, and find therein evidence amply sufficient to sustain the findings, and therefore affirm the order appealed from. The general assignment that errors of law were committed by the trial court presents no particular ruling for review. Butler-Ryan Co. v. Silvey, 70 Minn. 507, 73 N. W. 406, 510.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Therkeldsen v. Dorfner, 131 N.W. 481, 115 Minn. 528, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1282 (Mich. 1911).

131 N.W. 481 (Therkeldsen v. Dorfner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler-Ryan Co. v. Silvey
73 N.W. 406 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)