Therkeldsen v. Dorfner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Therkeldsen v. Dorfner

131 N.W. 481, 115 Minn. 528, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1282

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 9, 1911

DocketNos. 17,142—(142)

StatusPublished

This text of 131 N.W. 481 (Therkeldsen v. Dorfner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Therkeldsen v. Dorfner, 131 N.W. 481, 115 Minn. 528, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1282 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The assignments of error, though insufficient, are construed as presenting the sole question whether the evidence supports the findings and decision of the trial •court. We have examined the record, and find therein evidence amply sufficient to sustain the findings, and therefore affirm the order appealed from. The general assignment that errors of law were committed by the trial court presents no particular ruling for review. Butler-Ryan Co. v. Silvey, 70 Minn. 507, 73 N. W. 406, 510.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The assignments of error, though insufficient, are construed as presenting the sole question whether the evidence supports the findings and decision of the trial •court. We have examined the record, and find therein evidence amply sufficient to sustain the findings, and therefore affirm the order appealed from. The general assignment that errors of law were committed by the trial court presents no particular ruling for review. Butler-Ryan Co. v. Silvey, 70 Minn. 507, 73 N. W. 406, 510.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 N.W. 481, 115 Minn. 528, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/therkeldsen-v-dorfner-minn-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack