Theriot v. Bourg

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Theriot v. Bourg

550 So. 2d 659, 1989 La. LEXIS 2575, 1989 WL 129524

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 31, 1989

DocketNo. 89-CC-2406

StatusPublished

This text of 550 So. 2d 659 (Theriot v. Bourg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Theriot v. Bourg, 550 So. 2d 659, 1989 La. LEXIS 2575, 1989 WL 129524 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Bourg, Carl J.; Martin, Robert J. Jr.; Bergeron, Dorothy B.; Voisin, Mildred B.; Gallier, Evelina B:; Bourg Mariculture Inc.; —Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ter-rebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 92601; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 89-CW-1686.

Granted. This case is remanded to the district court to conclude hearing within thirty (30) days on whether temporary receivership should be dissolved and, if not, whether the security bond should be increased or a more qualified receiver be appointed, reserving the right of the parties to seek review in the court of appeal and thereafter in this court. The stay order issued in this proceeding is to remain in effect, the same being clarified to expressly permit Mildred B. Voisin, as President of the Harry Bourg Corporation, to take those actions which are necessary and proper to preserve and protect the property of the corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bourg, Carl J.; Martin, Robert J. Jr.; Bergeron, Dorothy B.; Voisin, Mildred B.; Gallier, Evelina B:; Bourg Mariculture Inc.; —Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ter-rebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 92601; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 89-CW-1686.

Granted. This case is remanded to the district court to conclude hearing within thirty (30) days on whether temporary receivership should be dissolved and, if not, whether the security bond should be increased or a more qualified receiver be appointed, reserving the right of the parties to seek review in the court of appeal and thereafter in this court. The stay order issued in this proceeding is to remain in effect, the same being clarified to expressly permit Mildred B. Voisin, as President of the Harry Bourg Corporation, to take those actions which are necessary and proper to preserve and protect the property of the corporation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 So. 2d 659, 1989 La. LEXIS 2575, 1989 WL 129524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theriot-v-bourg-la-1989.