Therese A. Ladd v. State
This text of Therese A. Ladd v. State (Therese A. Ladd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-06-0355-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 ______________________________
THERESE ANNE LADD,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;
NO. 17,294-C; HON. PATRICK PIRTLE, PRESIDING _______________________________
Order of Dismissal _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
Therese Anne Ladd appealed the order deferring her adjudication of guilt and
placing her on community supervision. The adjudication of her guilt was deferred on
February 24, 2006. Her notice of appeal, however, was dated September 5, 2006, and
received on September 7, 2006. Having waited over 180 days to file her notice, appellant’s
effort to perfect the appeal is untimely. See TEX . R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (stating that one has
30 to 90 days to perfect an appeal from an appealable order depending upon whether the appellant moved for a new trial); Manuel v. State, 994 S.W.2d 658, 662 (Tex. Crim. App.
1999) (recognizing as appealable an order deferring the adjudication of guilt). Being
untimely, we dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d
519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
Accordingly, appellant's appeal is dismissed.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Therese A. Ladd v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/therese-a-ladd-v-state-texapp-2006.