Theresa M. Richardson v. Alfred Morinobu Kubota

337 F.2d 842
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 1964
Docket9485_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 337 F.2d 842 (Theresa M. Richardson v. Alfred Morinobu Kubota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theresa M. Richardson v. Alfred Morinobu Kubota, 337 F.2d 842 (4th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff-appellant drove her automobile at a speed of 40 to 50 miles per hour. The defendant, driving behind her, noticed her erratic course, weaving from side to side. The plaintiff admitted that she may have dozed. As she approached a bridge she left the paved portion of the highway, entered on to the shoulder and, after continuing thereon for a time, seemed to be preparing to make a right turn into a gravel road intersecting the main highway on the right. However, she continued along the shoulder and rammed into the concrete abutment of the bridge. The impact swung plaintiff’s automobile in a clockwise direction athwart the defendant’s path, and the two vehicles then collided.

The District Court, 234 F.Supp. 856, upon the depositions of the parties, gave summary judgment for the defendant. We affirm upon the memorandum opinion of the court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 F.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theresa-m-richardson-v-alfred-morinobu-kubota-ca4-1964.