Theresa Barnett v. David S. Crockett

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 1, 2013.

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01099-CV

THERESA BARNETT, Appellant V.

DAVID S. CROCKETT, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-00136-F

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang-Miers, and Evans Opinion Per Curiam

The Court has before it appellees’ August 28, 2013 motion to dismiss and appellant’s

September 6, 2013 response to that motion. On September 9, 2013, this Court denied appellant’s

motion for damages and invited appellant to file an additional response to the motion to dismiss.

Appellant filed three additional responses, but did not respond to appellees’ argument that

appellant is attempting to appeal an interlocutory sanctions order. This Court does not have

jurisdiction over such an order. See Petito v. Energytec, Inc., No. 05-09-00140-CV, 2009 WL

1286330 at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 11, 2009, no pet.). Accordingly, we DISMISS this

appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

131099F.P05

S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

THERESA BARNETT, Appellant On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-13-01099-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 10-00136-F.

Opinion delivered Per Curiam. Justices DAVID S. CROCKETT, ET AL., Appellees O'Neill, Lang-Miers and Evans sitting for the Court.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellees DAVID S. CROCKETT, ET AL. recover their costs of this appeal from appellant THERESA BARNETT.

Judgment entered this 1st day of October, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE