Therapeutic Technologies, Inc. v. Asensio

509 So. 2d 410, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9358
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-3113
StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 410 (Therapeutic Technologies, Inc. v. Asensio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Therapeutic Technologies, Inc. v. Asensio, 509 So. 2d 410, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9358 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary final judgment. We reverse and remand. Not only were the prerequisites for entry of summary judgment not followed, as this court has recited must be done in Osceola County v. Goodman, 276 So.2d 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973) Van Arsdale v. DiMil Land Company, 264 So.2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972), but also we hold that even had those prerequisites been followed, the ambiguity of the contract would have precluded summary judgment. See Royal American Realty, Inc. v. Bank of Palm Beach and Trust Co., 215 So.2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., and LUZZO, JOHN T., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Royal American Rlty., Inc. v. Bank of Palm Beach & Tr. Co.
215 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Osceola County v. Goodman
276 So. 2d 210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Van Arsdale v. DiMil Land Co.
264 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
509 So. 2d 410, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/therapeutic-technologies-inc-v-asensio-fladistctapp-1987.