Theomas Rhodes v. Abel Saucedo
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 4, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00516-CV
THEOMAS RHODES, Appellant
V.
ABEL SAUCEDO, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01967-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated July 18, 2018, we informed
appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record.
We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements
to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had been found entitled to proceed
without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal
of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required
documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3 (b), (c).
/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
180516F.P05
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
THEOMAS RHODES, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-18-00516-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01967-B. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. ABEL SAUCEDO, Appellee Justices Evans and Brown participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee ABEL SAUCEDO recover his costs of this appeal from appellant THEOMAS RHODES.
Judgment entered October 4, 2018.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Theomas Rhodes v. Abel Saucedo (Theomas Rhodes v. Abel Saucedo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.