Theofanis v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.
This text of 266 A.D.2d 385 (Theofanis v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), entered December 10, 1998, which, inter alia, denied their motion to change the venue of the action from Bronx County to Westchester County.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
[386]*386The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to Westchester County. CPLR 504 (1) “exists for the benefit of a county or other governmental entity named as a defendant and not for the benefit of an individual litigant” (Swainson v Clee, 261 AD2d 301). Because Westchester County is not a party to the instant action, CPLR 504 (1) does not apply here (Swainson v Clee, supra).
The defendants also failed to make the necessary detailed evidentiary showing sufficient to warrant a change of venue based on the convenience of witnesses pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169, 170; Rampe v Giuliani, 227 AD2d 605). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.D.2d 385, 697 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theofanis-v-liberty-lines-transit-inc-nyappdiv-1999.