Theodore Tiedemann & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner
71 F.2d 1018, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365
This text of 71 F.2d 1018 (Theodore Tiedemann & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Theodore Tiedemann & Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner, 71 F.2d 1018, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365 (2d Cir. 1934).
Opinion
Affirmed on the authority of Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose, 286 U. S. 319, 52 S. Ct. 568, 76 L. Ed. 1128, and Planters’ Cotton Oil Co., Inc., v. Hopkins, 286 U. S. 332, 52 S. Ct. 509, 76 L. Ed. 1135; Uncasville Mfg. Co. v. Com’r, 55 F.(2d) 893 (C. C. A. 2); Helvering v. Post & Sheldon Corp., 71 F.(2d) 930 (C. C. A. 2) decided June 18, 1934.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Woolford Realty Co. v. Rose
286 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Planters Cotton Oil Co. v. Hopkins
286 U.S. 332 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Uncasville Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
55 F.2d 893 (Second Circuit, 1932)
Helvering v. Post & Sheldon Corp.
71 F.2d 930 (Second Circuit, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 F.2d 1018, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-tiedemann-sons-inc-v-commissioner-ca2-1934.