Theodore R. Foulkes v. State
This text of Theodore R. Foulkes v. State (Theodore R. Foulkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
THEODORE ROOSEVELT FOULKES,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-939
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 7, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Terence R. Perkins, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Theodore Foulkes entered a no contest plea to possession of cannabis in excess
of twenty grams after the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress. We affirm, without
discussion, the trial court’s denial of Foulkes’ motion to suppress. However, we agree
with Foulkes that the trial court erred in imposing costs of investigation where the State did not expressly request these costs. On remand, the State shall be afforded another
opportunity to request costs of investigation. McCarthy v. State, 893 So. 2d 689, 690
(Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Theodore R. Foulkes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-r-foulkes-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.