Theodore R. Carns and Bessie v. Carns v. United States

Third Circuit

Theodore R. Carns and Bessie v. Carns v. United States

194 F.2d 532, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2798

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1952

Docket10584_1

StatusPublished

This text of 194 F.2d 532 (Theodore R. Carns and Bessie v. Carns v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Theodore R. Carns and Bessie v. Carns v. United States, 194 F.2d 532, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2798 (3d Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal attacks as “clearly erroneous” within the meaning of Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, several findings of fact made by the District Court relating to particular elements of damage in an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. The case was tried by the Court below without a jury.

Our review of the record discloses that the challenged findings are correct in fact and in law under applicable decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme 'Court, and that the defendant’s contentions to the contrary are utterly without merit.

For the reasons stated the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

I

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal attacks as “clearly erroneous” within the meaning of Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, several findings of fact made by the District Court relating to particular elements of damage in an action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680. The case was tried by the Court below without a jury.

Our review of the record discloses that the challenged findings are correct in fact and in law under applicable decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme 'Court, and that the defendant’s contentions to the contrary are utterly without merit.

For the reasons stated the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

I

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 F.2d 532, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-r-carns-and-bessie-v-carns-v-united-states-ca3-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack