Theodore Menut v. Florida Parole Commission

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 2014
Docket14-1023
StatusPublished

This text of Theodore Menut v. Florida Parole Commission (Theodore Menut v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theodore Menut v. Florida Parole Commission, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

THEODORE MENUT, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-1023

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed December 4, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Theodore Menut, pro se, Petitioner.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, and Mark J. Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

PADOVANO, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Theodore Menut v. Florida Parole Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-menut-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2014.