Theodore Koppelman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

202 F.2d 955, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 457, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3466
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1953
Docket10733
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 F.2d 955 (Theodore Koppelman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theodore Koppelman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 202 F.2d 955, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 457, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3466 (3d Cir. 1953).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Rehearing was allowed because of petitioner’s contention that the Tax Court in the case of Ford v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 387, had in effect overruled its decision in this matter.

At the reargument it was admitted, as it should have been, that the opinion of the Supreme Court in Culbertson v. Commissioner, 337 U.S. 733, 69 S.Ct. 1210, 93 L.Ed. 1659, is still the controlling law. That opinion was specifically followed by the Tax Court both in Ford and in the issue at bar. It was properly applied by the Tax Court to the facts of this appeal. Those facts are readily distinguishable from the facts in the Ford case. The conclusion of the Tax Court that the agreement purporting to establish the partnership failed to satisfy the Culbertson test has sound support in the record considered as a whole.

We confirm our former decision. 199 F.2d 955.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. J.L.S.
2019 Ohio 4173 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 F.2d 955, 43 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 457, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-koppelman-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca3-1953.