Theodore Kenneth Gale v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden

Fourth Circuit

Theodore Kenneth Gale v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden

25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20902, 1994 WL 197090

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1994

Docket94-6001

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1039 (Theodore Kenneth Gale v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Theodore Kenneth Gale v. Carolyn v. Rickards, Warden, 25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20902, 1994 WL 197090 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Theodore Kenneth GALE, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Carolyn v. RICKARDS, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6001.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-1436-AM)

Theodore Kenneth Gale, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gale v. Rickards, No. CA-93-1436-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Theodore Kenneth GALE, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Carolyn v. RICKARDS, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 94-6001.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-1436-AM)

Theodore Kenneth Gale, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gale v. Rickards, No. CA-93-1436-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20902, 1994 WL 197090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-kenneth-gale-v-carolyn-v-rickards-warden-ca4-1994.