Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 2008·No. 136384·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 136384 & (18) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices THEODORE G. COURTER, JULIE M. COURTER, Individually and as Next Friend of AUDRY HYNDMAN, AMBER COURTER, MONICA COURTER and TANER CORTER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC 136384 v CoA 281215 Genesee CC 07-85575-NP DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, DAVID H. GELONECK and PETER R. THOM AND ASSOCIATES, Inc., Defendants, and

PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 9, 2008 _________________________________________ Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp, (Mich. 2008).

Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp (Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.