Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp
This text of Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp (Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 136384 & (18) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices THEODORE G. COURTER, JULIE M. COURTER, Individually and as Next Friend of AUDRY HYNDMAN, AMBER COURTER, MONICA COURTER and TANER CORTER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC 136384 v CoA 281215 Genesee CC 07-85575-NP DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, DAVID H. GELONECK and PETER R. THOM AND ASSOCIATES, Inc., Defendants, and
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________________
On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 9, 2008 _________________________________________ Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Theodore G Courter v. Daimlerchrysler Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-g-courter-v-daimlerchrysler-corp-mich-2008.