Theodore F. Appleby and Marie W. Appleby v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

296 F.2d 925, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 372
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 1962
Docket13690_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 296 F.2d 925 (Theodore F. Appleby and Marie W. Appleby v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theodore F. Appleby and Marie W. Appleby v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 296 F.2d 925, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 372 (3d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decisive fact issue here is whether petitioners have met the “active business” requirement of Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 355 so as to have the distribution of the stock of the wholly owned subsidiary qualify as a non-taxable distribution. While the Tax Court decision could have gone the other way there is ample evidence in the record to support it; certainly we cannot say that it is clearly wrong.

The decision of the Tax Court, 35 T.C. 755, will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 F.2d 925, 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodore-f-appleby-and-marie-w-appleby-v-commissioner-of-internal-ca3-1962.