Theodore Beech Medley v. D.L. Runnels, Warden
486 F.3d 1127, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9910, 2007 WL 1288747
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2007·No. 05-55295·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it *1128 is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel unpublished disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Theodore Beech Medley v. D.L. Runnels, Warden, 486 F.3d 1127, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9910, 2007 WL 1288747 (9th Cir. 2007).
486 F.3d 1127 (Theodore Beech Medley v. D.L. Runnels, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Medley v. Runnels
506 F.3d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)