Theodist Tyrone Richardson v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 2015
Docket14-5335
StatusPublished

This text of Theodist Tyrone Richardson v. State of Florida (Theodist Tyrone Richardson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theodist Tyrone Richardson v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

THEODIST TYRONE NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO RICHARDSON, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D14-5335 v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________/

Opinion filed December 31, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. James H. Daniel, Judge.

Teresa J. Sopp, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder, second-degree murder,

attempted first-degree murder, six counts of attempted second-degree murder, and

shooting or throwing deadly missiles into occupied dwellings, all stemming from a

shoot-out at an apartment complex. He raises two issues on appeal, we affirm as to

the first issue without further comment. In the second issue, Appellant contends

that the trial court erred when instructing the jury as to self-defense for three separate reasons. We reach only his argument that the court erred in giving the

“aggressor” instruction pursuant to section 776.041, Florida Statutes (2011), which

included the requirement that Appellant was to have “exhausted every reasonable

means to escape the danger,” in direct conflict with the statutory right to stand

one’s ground then in effect. On this point, we agree with Appellant that it is

necessary to reverse his convictions and remand for a new trial based on our

precedent in Floyd v. State, 151 So. 3d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), review granted,

State v. Floyd, 168 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Dec. 16, 2014); Ross v. State, 157 So. 3d 406

(Fla. 1st DCA 2015); and Swearingden v. State, 2015 WL 2189750 (Fla. 1st DCA

May 12, 2015).

REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deandre Ross v. State of Florida
157 So. 3d 406 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Floyd v. State
151 So. 3d 452 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Theodist Tyrone Richardson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodist-tyrone-richardson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.