Theodist R. Thomas v. C & C Residental Properties

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 2019
Docket05-17-01450-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Theodist R. Thomas v. C & C Residental Properties (Theodist R. Thomas v. C & C Residental Properties) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Theodist R. Thomas v. C & C Residental Properties, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Dismissed; Opinion Filed March 27, 2018.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01450-CV

THEODIST R. THOMAS, Appellant V. C & C RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06257-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart The clerk’s record in this case is past due. By letter dated February 12, 2018, we informed

appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record.

We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification of payment or arrangements

to pay for the clerk’s record or written verification appellant had been found entitled to proceed

without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so could result in the dismissal

of this appeal. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed and appellant has not provided the

required documentation regarding the clerk’s record nor otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

/Craig Stoddart/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

171450F.P05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

THEODIST R. THOMAS, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-17-01450-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-06257-C. Opinion delivered by Justice Stoddart. C & C RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES, Justices Francis and Brown participating. Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee C & C RESIDENTAL PROPERTIES recover its costs of this appeal from appellant THEODIST R. THOMAS.

Judgment entered this 27th day of March, 2018.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Theodist R. Thomas v. C & C Residental Properties, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theodist-r-thomas-v-c-c-residental-properties-texapp-2019.