Theo McClure Jr. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), General Motors Corporation
This text of 37 F.3d 1499 (Theo McClure Jr. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), General Motors Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
37 F.3d 1499
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Theo McCLURE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE &
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), Defendant,
General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-2041.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Sept. 30, 1994.
Before: RYAN and SILER, Circuit Judges; DOWD, District Judge*.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable David D. Dowd, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 F.3d 1499, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35038, 1994 WL 532957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theo-mcclure-jr-v-international-union-united-autom-ca6-1994.