Theo F. Boblitt v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Theo F. Boblitt v. United States

285 F.2d 113

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 16, 1960

Docket17088_1

StatusPublished

This text of 285 F.2d 113 (Theo F. Boblitt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Theo F. Boblitt v. United States, 285 F.2d 113 (9th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction for a violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 407 is reversed. The “deposit of loose timber and other materials upon the bank of a navigable water, to-wit, San Francisco Bay,” was charged.

We are unable to convince ourselves that there is enough evidence in the record from which the jury was entitled to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction for a violation of 33 U.S.C.A. § 407 is reversed. The “deposit of loose timber and other materials upon the bank of a navigable water, to-wit, San Francisco Bay,” was charged.

We are unable to convince ourselves that there is enough evidence in the record from which the jury was entitled to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was guilty.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

285 F.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theo-f-boblitt-v-united-states-ca9-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack