Thelma M St. Clair v. Great Eastern Resort Mgt etal

• Court: Court of Appeals of Virginia
• Decided: February 6, 1996
• Docket: 1666954
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick

THELMA MORRIS ST. CLAIR

v. Record No. 1666-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM GREAT EASTERN RESORT MANAGEMENT FEBRUARY 6, 1996 AND HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Thelma Morris St. Clair, pro se, on brief).

(Dawn E. Boyce; Heather K. Bardot; Trichilo, Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & Judkins, on brief), for appellees.

Thelma Morris St. Clair (claimant) contends that the

Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding

that she failed to prove that her back injury was causally

related to her compensable February 13, 1993 injury by accident.

Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we

conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we

summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27.

On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable

to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). "To

establish by a preponderance of the evidence a causal connection

between the incident and the claimed disability, the 'proof must

go beyond conjecture.'" Ratliff v. Rocco Farms Foods, 16 Va.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. App. 234, 237, 429 S.E.2d 39, 41 (1993) (quoting Southall v.

Eldridge Reams, Inc., 198 Va. 545, 548, 95 S.E.2d 145, 147

(1956)). Moreover, unless we can say as a matter of law that

claimant's evidence sustained her burden of proving causation,

the commission's findings are binding and conclusive upon us.

Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co., 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d

833, 835 (1970).

The commission denied claimant's application because her

treating physician, Dr. Stephen Phillips, was unable to render an

opinion to a reasonable degree of medical probability that her

herniated disc and subsequent surgery and disability were

causally related to her February 13, 1993 injury by accident.

The record supports this finding. Between February 15, 1993 and March 7, 1994, claimant did

not mention back or leg pain to Dr. Phillips. Beginning in April

1993, claimant returned to work without restriction. On March 7,

1994, more than one year after the accident, claimant complained

to Dr. Phillips of the recent onset of leg pain. A CT scan

revealed a left herniated disc at the L5-S1 level. Based upon

claimant's ability to perform her regular work and her lack of

complaints suggestive of a herniated disc for approximately one

year after the accident, Dr. Phillips opined that it was

"possible" that claimant's back condition was related to the

accident. There is no other credible medical evidence in the

2 record supporting a causal connection. 1

Based upon the speculative nature of Dr. Phillips' opinion

and the lack of other credible medical evidence supporting a

causal connection between claimant's back condition and her

February 13, 1993 injury by accident, we cannot say as a matter

of law that claimant sustained her burden of proof. Accordingly,

we affirm the commission's decision.

Affirmed.

1 We note that the commission, in its role as fact finder, was entitled to give little weight to Dr. John Jane's opinion, which was based upon an inaccurate history. Dr. Jane indicated that claimant told him that all of her pain began immediately after the February 1993 accident. Dr. Jane's opinion was based upon this temporal continuity. However, as stated herein, the medical records show that claimant did not complain of leg or back pain until March 1994, more than one year after the accident.