Thelma Garza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
This text of Thelma Garza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Thelma Garza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 30, 2022
No. 04-22-00673-CV
Thelma GARZA et al, Appellant
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CV01903 Honorable Melissa Vara, Judge Presiding
ORDER On November 29, 2022, appellant filed an emergency motion, seeking to stay execution of a writ of possession. Because appellant did not file the mandatory supersedeas bond, this court cannot grant the requested relief. See TEX. PROP. CODE § 24.007 (“A judgment of a county court may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount set by the county court.”); Marshall v. Housing Authority of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 786-87 (Tex. 2006).
Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion.
_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of November, 2022.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thelma Garza v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thelma-garza-v-deutsche-bank-national-trust-company-texapp-2022.