Theis v. Langworthy

270 A.D.2d 954, 705 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment based on defendant’s delay in appearing in the action in response to plaintiffs summons with notice and properly granted defendant an extension of time to file a notice of appearance and demand for the complaint (see, CPLR 3012 [d]). Defendant provided a reasonable excuse for the brief delay and established a meritorious defense to the complaint, plaintiff was not prejudiced by the delay, and public policy favors the resolution of cases on their merits (see, Kaiser v Delaney, 255 AD2d 362; Cleary v East Syracuse-Minoa Cent. School Dist., 248 AD2d 1005; Pollack v Eskander, 191 AD2d 1022, 1023, appeal dismissed 81 NY2d 1067). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. — Default Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Theis v. Langworthy, 270 A.D.2d 954, 705 N.Y.S.2d 308, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 954 (Theis v. Langworthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Village of Parish v. Weichert
291 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)