Thebaud v. National Cordage Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Thebaud v. National Cordage Co.

57 F. 567, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2803

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 57 F. 567 (Thebaud v. National Cordage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thebaud v. National Cordage Co., 57 F. 567, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2803 (circtsdny 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion is denied. This court, upon summary motion made in this case,. should not undertake to [568]*568determine what rights, if any, the third parties claimant of the goods levied upon may or may not have against the sheriff, nor, in advance of a. final adjustment of all possible claims in such form as would be binding upon all parties, should it interfere with the security the sheriff has obtained from those who required him to take the responsibility of levy. That the complainants entered into a most improvident contract with the surety company, or that the latter is acting unconscionably in retaining their cash as collateral security, when all chance of the company’s being called on to respond is at an end, does not alter the situation, so far as the sheriff is concerned.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The motion is denied. This court, upon summary motion made in this case,. should not undertake to [568]*568determine what rights, if any, the third parties claimant of the goods levied upon may or may not have against the sheriff, nor, in advance of a. final adjustment of all possible claims in such form as would be binding upon all parties, should it interfere with the security the sheriff has obtained from those who required him to take the responsibility of levy. That the complainants entered into a most improvident contract with the surety company, or that the latter is acting unconscionably in retaining their cash as collateral security, when all chance of the company’s being called on to respond is at an end, does not alter the situation, so far as the sheriff is concerned.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 F. 567, 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thebaud-v-national-cordage-co-circtsdny-1893.