Theatrical Club v. Bernard
78 S.E. 410, 140 Ga. 76, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 37
Opinion
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The motion for a new trial was based only on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and the weight of the evidence, and without evidence to support it. The presiding judge approved the finding, and this court will not interfere.
2. Although the evidence for the plaintiff might have- authorized a verdict for a greater amount than that found, under th& facts of the case this will not necessitate a reversal on motion of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Theatrical Club v. Bernard, 78 S.E. 410, 140 Ga. 76, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 37 (Ga. 1913).
78 S.E. 410 (Theatrical Club v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gilreath v. Argo
219 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Smallpiece v. Johnson
80 S.E.2d 296 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)