Theatrical Club v. Bernard
This text of 78 S.E. 410 (Theatrical Club v. Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict. The motion for a new trial was based only on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, and the weight of the evidence, and without evidence to support it. The presiding judge approved the finding, and this court will not interfere.
2. Although the evidence for the plaintiff might have- authorized a verdict for a greater amount than that found, under th& facts of the case this will not necessitate a reversal on motion of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 410, 140 Ga. 76, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/theatrical-club-v-bernard-ga-1913.